http://conlaw.jotwell.com/why-exactly-are-jackson-pollocks-paintings-shielded-by-the-first-amendment/ The Journal of Things We Like (Lots) Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:35:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://conlaw.jotwell.com/why-exactly-are-jackson-pollocks-paintings-shielded-by-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-221 daniel Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:56:49 +0000 http://conlaw.jotwell.com/?p=88#comment-221 Fascinating. Would you say that the distinction between cognitive and non-cognitive also holds in utterances like insults or rude language? Bar threats of violence or incitement to hatred, ofcourse - there has been this big debate in the Netherlands related to this. Fascinating. Would you say that the distinction between cognitive and non-cognitive also holds in utterances like insults or rude language? Bar threats of violence or incitement to hatred, ofcourse – there has been this big debate in the Netherlands related to this.

]]>