<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mismatch Problem:  Why Election Law Isn&#8217;t Always Built for the Electorate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conlaw.jotwell.com/the-mismatch-problem-why-election-law-isnt-always-built-for-the-electorate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conlaw.jotwell.com/the-mismatch-problem-why-election-law-isnt-always-built-for-the-electorate/</link>
	<description>The Journal of Things We Like (Lots)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Zimmer</title>
		<link>http://conlaw.jotwell.com/the-mismatch-problem-why-election-law-isnt-always-built-for-the-electorate/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Zimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conlaw.jotwell.com/?p=109#comment-271</guid>
		<description>I am not convinced that there are &quot;national&quot; parties in this country. Sure, there are supposedly national Democratic and Republican parties. But, at the candidate level, each candidate has his or her own Democratic or Republican party. That is, if the candidate can get elected and reelected without regard to anything else, they are free from any real party discipline.

The health care reform debacle is a good example: The national Republican Party has excercised party discipline because they can all coalesce around the &quot;just say no&quot; position. I doubt there would  be unity if that position could not be maintained. The lack of any party discipline in the so-called national Democratic Party, along with many other dysfunctional features of our Congress, means that there is no position common to all Democrats. Watching all these outliers from the main base of the Democratic Party  -- be it Max Baucus, Joe Lieberman or Bill Nelson -- demonstrate their individual power even though it has an overall devastating effect on the party as a whole demonstrates that a &quot;national&quot; Democratic Party is more myth than reality.

The populist pushback is another good example: Virtually everyone outside of Wall Street and Washington are outraged that &quot;we&quot; have saved the banks only to seem them return to their rapacious conduct while little is done for most of the people generally who are certainly less to blame than the Masters of the Universe and their Washington syncophants. With the outlier Democrats getting the attention, the &quot;national&quot; Party is only now realizing the error of their ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not convinced that there are &#8220;national&#8221; parties in this country. Sure, there are supposedly national Democratic and Republican parties. But, at the candidate level, each candidate has his or her own Democratic or Republican party. That is, if the candidate can get elected and reelected without regard to anything else, they are free from any real party discipline.</p>
<p>The health care reform debacle is a good example: The national Republican Party has excercised party discipline because they can all coalesce around the &#8220;just say no&#8221; position. I doubt there would  be unity if that position could not be maintained. The lack of any party discipline in the so-called national Democratic Party, along with many other dysfunctional features of our Congress, means that there is no position common to all Democrats. Watching all these outliers from the main base of the Democratic Party  &#8212; be it Max Baucus, Joe Lieberman or Bill Nelson &#8212; demonstrate their individual power even though it has an overall devastating effect on the party as a whole demonstrates that a &#8220;national&#8221; Democratic Party is more myth than reality.</p>
<p>The populist pushback is another good example: Virtually everyone outside of Wall Street and Washington are outraged that &#8220;we&#8221; have saved the banks only to seem them return to their rapacious conduct while little is done for most of the people generally who are certainly less to blame than the Masters of the Universe and their Washington syncophants. With the outlier Democrats getting the attention, the &#8220;national&#8221; Party is only now realizing the error of their ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
